Well, here I am again, writing my second post. Things have been a little crazy between the time I first made this weblog and now. I had a little misleading week last week with a few lessons cancelled and something moved, and then this week has been an absolute horror, because (of course) all of my teachers wanted to catch up on everything this week. So I was a bit busy.
Besides that, it's been a week of accomplishments, for me. I know that last time I was complaining and nagging about the fact how horrible I felt about the whole broken leg-thing, but now that I've got a cast with which I can walk (although I am not allowes to put all of my weight on that leg), things are going a lot smoother. I'm more optimistic now, fortunately.
Done with the broken leg story for now. Let me tell you all a bit about what I'm doing. I'm studying History at the University of Leiden in Holland. I'm in my first year, and in my second semester. Last semester we covered Ancient History (failed that), Dutch History, Writing Skills, Introduction to Historical Science and History of the New Time (misleading title, covers European history from 1200 to French Revolution, failed that too). This semester, we're covering Medieval History, Economic and Social History, Contemporary History (modern history, roughly the last two or three centuries) and Writing Skills II.
I'm actually very interested in Medieval History, but the downside to the subject is that the book we're using is so incredibly dull... I can't get myself to read it properly. It's a real shame, but I reckon things will start to get better once we move further in history. Right now, we're covering the massive migration movements of barbaric peoples in the third and fourth centuries. Somehow, it's difficult for me to understand these people and their motives, maybe because the time gap is too big. I had the same with Ancient History. Apparently there's an invisible line for me, indicating at what time I start understanding the human psyche of that time. And that's where history gets interesting for me, being able to put myself in another's position.
Other than that, I'm very interested in the history of religion, which pretty much means that I'll deal with the Reformation and the Counter-Reformation a lot if I decide to specialize in that. But it's something like a recurring thing throughout the year, right now, it never fails to spark my interest. Just lately, I read an article from a historian who tried to draw a link between economical rationality (and thus economic succes) and Protestantism, especially Calvinism. Here's the explanation in short: the importance of labour has ever been stressed in the Calvinist religion, and that is linked to their strong belief in the predestination principle. Predestination means that God has elected a few good people to go to Heaven after their death. These 'chosen ones' don't really have to do anything throughout their life, because their election is self-evident from their faith. Any doubts are inspired by the devil, and thus already signifies that you are not one of the Chosen. Well, since the Calvinists were inspired by their preachers not to focus on the afterlife too much (they were already chosen after all), they should focus on working, fulfilling a goal set by God through labour, thereby honouring Him in daily life, besides just in Church. However, they have also been taught the principle of ascetism. Leading a sober lifestyle. That meant that they had to take every opportunity that got to earn money, because working hard would honour God, but that they could only spend it on what they really needed, because they needed to stick to the principle of ascetism as well. That eventually leaded to a sense of economic rationality and insight, and thus in an accumulation of capital.
Well, it seems true, doesn't it? But then again, religious motives may only contribute in the tiniest amount to the work ethic that may or may not occur more among people of the Protestant religion. It's a very dangerous claim to make, because he is dealing with something immaterial, something spiritual as his proof. Then again, it does raise eyebrows to know that Catholics have ever been poorer than Protestants, statistically.
Well, I suppose that's it for today! A little insight into what I do in daily life.
I'll keep you updated!
Linnaai.